Conflicts between members and clients
Professional members or firms should not accept or continue an engagement where there is a conflict of interest between the member or firm and its client. The test is whether a “reasonable and informed third party” would consider the conflict of interest as likely to affect the judgement of the member or the firm.
Professional members or firms should not accept or continue an engagement where there is a conflict of interest between the member or firm and its client. The test is whether a “reasonable and informed third party” would consider the conflict of interest as likely to affect the judgement of the member or the firm.
Examples of this might be:
- when members compete directly with a client
- the receipt of commission from a third party for the introduction of a client (for example, an audit firm may be paid a commission by another entity, such as a firm of brokers, for introducing the entity to its client companies).
Safeguards against a conflict of interest between members and clients might include:
- disclosure of the conflict/commission to the client, and
- obtaining the informed consent of the client.